1.0: Work on and finish Jackian epistemology 1.1: Finish lining out your theory of justification 1.2: Start lining out your theory of truth 1.2.1: Demonstrate how your theory of truth necessarily follows your solution to the logocentric predicament so no one can disagree with it 1.3: Continue thinking about what…

07/12/2022 I tried to disprove how I feel with logic but this shit’s true.[1] — Brakence, Cavern Music I: The Supposed Logocentric Structure of Reality The first and foremost supposition when it comes to any theory of anything is something “applies” to it in the sense that “something” regulates. Of course, the regulation could be an absence…

07/14/2022 1: Introduction The retreat to epistemic privacy, or “the Private,” is a necessary movement within any sound and valid epistemology. It is necessary because there is a certain categorical circularity that arises when warrants about public propositions come from other public propositions.[1] Because epistemic privacy resits such categorical circularity, any epistemology…

By Evan Jack and Erik Schulz — With Erik and I’s solution to the logocentric predicament comes a worry of relativism. This worry causes great anxiety in me for what would the product of all my efforts be other than everyone being right, which is to say, other than a total trivialism, practically indistinguishable from illogic? What…

The Summer of 2022 — So far, I have carefully laid out the ultimate foundations of first philosophy: non-propositional, non-inferential, epistemically private, genuine reasons for belief that serve as real justification for true beliefs. The issue of finding non-arbitrary, non-circular, and non-infinitely regressive ground to stand on has been an issue I’ve always been trying…

06/11/2022 When Wittgenstein speaks of showing instead of saying he is establishing some type of difference between the two. What is this difference’s relationship with epistemic privacy? It is one that doesn’t really change things, which is to say, showing and saying have the same relation to epistemic privacy: one…

05/29/2022 In order to have anti-skeptical epistemic privacy, one needs more than non-propositionality. For if one has inferentiality, then the inference can be questioned, putting that which one claimed to have private justification for in limbo, in that, its actual epistemic status is now not only validly in question, but…

Rational Intuition vs. Empirical Intuition — 05/20/2022 In my email to BonJour, I explicated how epistemic privacy could provide metajustification for the genuineness of an intuition. Then, in my essay “The Logocentric Predicament and Its Solution by way of Second-Order Private Justification,” I explicated how certain intuitions were dependent on others and/or did not meet the…